Posts Tagged ‘DSTP’

Aligning Assessments to Common Core

Posted by

Even as we continue to analyze the latest round of DCAS data and await detailed school-by-school results, work is underway on the future Delaware state assessment.

One of two multi-state assessment consortia formed in the wake of Race to the Top, the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) is developing ELA and math assessments that are aligned to both the Common Core and college readiness expectations.  In September 2011, Delaware officially signed on as a governing member of SBAC, and is one of 27 states participating in its development and eventual implementation.  This summer, teachers from SBAC governing states are working to develop over 5,000 test items for the assessment that will be ready for field testing as early as next school year.

DCAS has been a gradual departure from the traditional model of standardized tests.  Like its predecessor, the DSTP, most questions on the DCAS are multiple choice questions, with occasional items that better utilize the functionality of a computer-based exam (eg, math questions that require student to graph or science questions predicting the effect of a physical phenomenon).  Smarter Balanced will continue this evolution, replacing selected-response questions with primarily constructed-response questions.  Like the Common Core itself, Smarter Balanced will test not only factual recall but problem-solving and critical-thinking skills, too.  Each test will also include multiple “performance tasks” – multi-step extended-response questions that will ask students to analyze new information and apply existing knowledge to a real-world scenario. 

Field testing – non-graded questions included in the DCAS – will commence this upcoming school year, with full implementation planned for the 2014-15 school year.  We know successful implementation will require additional work from teachers, administrators, and the Delaware Department of Education, particularly in a few key areas:

  • Communication: One success of RTTT has been the state’s commitment to data-informed instruction.  In converting to the new assessment, it is important that SBAC is presented as an iterative improvement of DCAS that will offer teachers more helpful data and more rigorous support materials.
  • Alignment: Because SBAC is formulating a national test, and because test items are being written from scratch, we need to expect full and thorough alignment with the Common Core by 2014.  While it has always been the goal to align DCAS with Common Core by this time, we should expect neither wiggle room for implementation nor overlap with current state standards.
  • Reporting: Last year, we noted that the new state assessment represented a reset for student performance data.  Because the new test held students to a higher bar, there was not a fair or rigorous way to analyze year-over-year growth.  Will there be a way to compare data pre- and post-SBAC implementation?  If not, how will that effect testing over the next two school years?  And, most importantly, how will we stack up against other states once we finally have an apples-to-apples comparison?
  • Performance Tasks: Most students do not have experience with performance-task assessments.  For that reason, it will be important for teachers to prepare students with practice assessments and other test-taking strategies.  We know preparing students for item types is an important part of standardized assessment; when students take a test unprepared for the question types, it is impossible to determine whether represent a knowledge or assessment problem.

Many of these same concerns were raised about the DCAS years ago.  I’ve administered the DCAS for two years now and used the data it produces in my classroom frequently.  While there were some bumps along the road, the DCAS has become a tremendously useful tool in unit preparation.  With training, clear communication, and teacher involvement, I am confident SBAC as well will further both data-driven instruction and student achievement.

Partnership Zone School (Round 2) Profile: Laurel Middle School

Posted by

On September 1st, 2011, Secretary Lowery and the Department of Education announced the 6 schools chosen to participate in round 2 of the statewide Partnership Zone Initiative (for more information about the Partnership Zone, see our previous blogs).

Last week a question was raised about the data used to determine the schools in the Partnership Zone, leading to a revision announced by Secretary Lowery on Oct. 10 moving Bayard out of the Partnership Zone and placing Laurel Middle on the list.

Laurel Middle is the only school in the Laurel school district serving grades 7th-8th (there is also an “intermediate” school in the same building that is 5th-6th grade). Last year there were 348 students, 62% of which were from low-income households, 28% African-American, 6% Hispanic/Latino, and 17% identified as Special Education. There have been no major demographic shifts or enrollment changes in the past few years. Laurel Middle made AYP in 2007 and again this year, falling short in 2008-2010.

Based on 2011 DCAS spring scores (50% of the determination for PZ schools), Laurel Middle students:

  • Demonstrated lower proficiency in both ELA and math than the state average (gaps between 8% and 14%).
  • Showed fall to spring growth slightly below the state in 7th grade and slightly above the state in 8th grade in both subjects (this is not part of the determination but interesting to note)

Based on DSTP historical trends (2008-2010, the other 50%), Laurel Middle students:

  • Saw a slight decline in proficiency (2%) in 7th grade ELA, and a significant decline (15%) in 8th grade ELA, and declines in both grades in math proficiency (7th – 8%, 8th – 6%).
  • Have performed worse on average than the state in both subjects and grades.

While it is unfortunate the error in calculation occurred, DDOE corrected the mistake as soon as they found it, and Laurel’s acting superintendent Dr. Dorothy Nave has welcomed the change, stating they are excited to be part of the reform work. It is not yet clear how much money and extra assistance will be available for Laurel Middle and how this may affect the other schools (if at all). As for Bayard, Secretary Lowery has encouraged them to continue to work to improve their academic performance.

Laurel’s next school board meeting is on October 19; a notice as to time and place has not yet been posted.

 

Partnership Zone School (Round 2) Profile: Stanton Middle School

Posted by

On September 1st, 2011, Secretary Lowery and the Department of Education announced the 6 schools chosen to participate in round 2 of the statewide Partnership Zone Initiative (for more information about the Partnership Zone, see our previous blogs). This blog is the last of a six part series detailing these six schools (Bancroft Elementary, Bayard Middle, Dover High, Lewis Dual Language Academy, and Marbrook Elementary).

Stanton is a middle school in the Red Clay school district that serves 716 students in grades 6-8, 73% of which are low income,32% African-American, and 31% Hispanic/Latino. Stanton has had steadily rising student enrollment numbers (597 in 2008 to 716 in 2011) and a concurrent rise in Hispanic and low income students (both of which are enrolled at much higher proportions than the district or state). All three Red Clay PZ schools have much higher proportions of Hispanic/Latino students, which is new from last year and representative of recent demographic shifts.

Based on 2011 DCAS spring scores (50% of the determination for PZ schools), Stanton students:

  • Demonstrated much lower proficiency in both ELA and math than the district average (which in turn was lower than the state average).
  • Proficiency in ELA was barely over half that of the district and state (32% vs. 62% in 6th grade). In math, 6th and 8th graders showed less than half the proficiency of the district and state (27% vs. 57% in 6th; 7th did slightly better but still underperformed).
  • Showed mixed fall to spring growth, with some grades growing more than the state—notable for a school which feeds from other low-performers (including Marbrook, another PZ school). This suggests that Stanton’s low scores may partially be explained by the fact that their students enter less proficient than those of other middle schools in the state.

Based on DSTP historical trends (2008-2010, the other 50% of the determination), Stanton students:

  • Have seen dramatic declines in ELA proficiency (as much as a 17 percentage point decrease). All grades were level in 2008 with the district and state but have declined much faster than either.
  • Have performed worse than the district and state, and have seen significant declines in math proficiency (but less than ELA), compared to a district and state trend of staying level or seeing slight gains in proficiency.

Although some were surprised that Stanton was not accompanied by another middle school in Red Clay (A.I. Dupont performed worse on the DCAS), Stanton has not met AYP for four years, and its performance has been falling rapidly since 2008 (when it was nominated as a Blue Ribbon School). As with the other Red Clay schools chosen, Stanton has had success in the past in driving student achievement but needs strong leadership to reverse its current downward trend. The DDOE is reviewing requests for qualification from organizations who may be invited to present to districts and schools their innovative and proven strategies to turnaround low-performing schools.

Help Red Clay make the right decisions at their next School Board Meeting on Wednesday, September 21st at Warner Elementary. For additional information on Red Clay and the Partnership Zone, there will be a meeting on Oct. 3 at 6pm at Stanton.

Follow Us

We're social

Stay Informed


Contact Us

For further info